Tuesday, March 29, 2011

I hope Yarmouth does the right thing after dog bite incident

It's been in the news that a woman was critically injured by a "pit bull" type dog down in Yarmouth yesterday - she was injured badly enough that she had to be air-lifted to Halifax where her condition has improved from critical to serious.

Tonight on the news the Mayor of Yarmouth said that he is looking at changing their bylaw to tighten leash and muzzle laws in their town. I liked that nowhere in the news piece did anyone say that "pit bulls" needed to be banned - but in several places the victim's relatives and friends said "it doesn't matter what kind of dog you have, no dog is allowed to be vicious", and the victim's boyfriend said "I've had all kinds of dogs in my life and none of them ever bit anyone -it's all the way they're raised" - so they all understood that it wasn't the breed of dog that caused their loved one to be so seriously injured - it was the dog's owner who caused the situation.

In fact - people are calling for the other 2 dogs owned by the attacking dogs owner to be seized. The dog who attacked the woman attacked someone else in the last 2 years - and for some reason was returned to his current owner - and now this horrific attack happened.

Reading the current dog bylaw for Yarmouth - I can understand why - it is a horrible bylaw.

You can read it here - http://townofyarmouth.ca/town-council/by-laws

It says that a dog that is a dog control officer, peace officeror bylaw enforcement officer can shoot on sight any dog which is "fierce and dangerous" - but they can also do that to any dog that is barking too much, or any dog that is running at large - and they also no definition whatsoever of what a fierce and dangerous dog is - which is absolutely ludicrous.

Basically they're allowed to shoot on sight any dog that they feel like shooting for whatever reason they feel like shooting them for - but that is just about the most reactive kind of legislation you can have - the dog is already in the process of killing your dog, your animal, your kid or an adult - it's not being proactive at all - which is the worst kind of legislation you can possibly have (in my opinion).


There is nothing in the bylaw that actually protects humans from dogs - and also protects dogs from humans, which good bylaws today do.

I also hope that Yarmouth doesn't act really reactively like it has in the past.

In 2006 they almost passed a public space ban by banning all dogs from their downtown area because there were some people who were afraid of the young people who were walking their "big macho dogs" in the downtown area. Luckily at the last minute they listened to the public outrage and didn't go forward with it. I wrote a post about it at the time if you want to read the background to that story.

This horrible incident could have a good outcome if Yarmouth chooses to take the opportunity to update their dog bylaw and do what Windsor did and include the NS SPCA and the public and stakeholders in the process. I hope they do that. They don't have to re-create the wheel - they don't even have to look very far.



video

5 comments:

  1. Joan,

    I hope someone that the town of Yarmouth will listen to will contact them about the Parrsboro bylaws.

    H

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is some information in this story that is being ignored or filtered by the press. Why was this woman entering a dwelling that is not hers while the owner is out? Did she break and enter to gain access?

    I understand that this would not excuse the attack, but could provide better insight as to why it happened.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:02 PM

    My name is Gary Woods,I'm the dog owner that attacked the lady who enter my home while I wasn't there .I'm very sorry that it happen but she had no right to go into my home while I wasn't there and further more she had no business being there in the first place.she knew I had dogs cause she rented from my wife and I in the past .The question should be asked what was she trying to do coming into my home going threw 2 doors and the second door has a sign saying knock before coming in.well, I guess she didn't knock cause if she did my dogs would of barked and anybody with common sence would never open the door knowing they heard dogs baking unless you was trying to rob me.I'm a very responsibel dog owner I had dogs pretty much all my life and I dont feed my dogs raw meat and gun powder .I treat my dogs better than most people treat there kids and to all you people dont have a clue what your talking about you should get your facts straight before flapping your mouth off .The bottom line is she had no reason to come to my home at all and my son Zeke had to pay with his life cause of a ignorant person with no common sence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi there Gary - I hope that you've read the other posts I've written on this blog about your story - I am actually on your side - I think that what happened to you and your dog is wrong - and I think the bylaw in your town is very bad - and the bylaw that they're trying to have passed is also very bad as it's currently proposed - wanting to have pit bull type dogs and rottweillers be restricted - I've written 3 other posts besides this post about about your story on this blog if you want to check them out and you make up your mind - http://dogkisser.blogspot.com/2011/04/i-got-awesome-comment-from-someone-who.html

    http://dogkisser.blogspot.com/2011/04/town-of-yarmouth-best-of-dog-bylaws.html

    http://dogkisser.blogspot.com/2011/03/yarmouth-mayor-wants-province-wide-bsl.html

    ReplyDelete