Help sought in SPCA probe of dog’s death

This is further information about the post I made on Wednesday about the dog found hanged in Brookside, outside Halifax

This photo from the SPCA shows a male mixed breed-dog found dead in the snow Wednesday after it was hanged from a nearby tree in Brookside, outside Halifax.

Help Sought in SPCA Probe of Dog's Death


The Nova Scotia SPCA is seeking the public’s help in finding out who is responsible for killing a dog the agency says was recently hanged from a tree in metro.

Sean Kelly, a spokesman for the agency, said Thursday the animal’s death, which the SPCA said was caused by being strung up with an electrical cord, is disturbing and worrisome.

The mixed-breed dog, about the size of a Labrador retriever, was an unneutered male found in Brookside, outside Halifax. An autopsy is being done in Truro and should help determine its age.

"It’s very concerning to us," Mr. Kelly said of the dog’s death. "Anybody who would be this cruel and this calculating to this dog, in my view, would have no problem doing it to a person."

Mr. Kelly said the SPCA received a phone call Wednesday afternoon about a dead dog lying in the snow in Brookside. It was near a tree that had an industrial electrical cord tied around it.

The dog had part of the cord around its neck.

An SPCA investigator sent to the scene made the grisly discovery, said Mr. Kelly.

"It appeared that the dog was hanged from the tree," he told The Chronicle Herald. "And then the person cut the cord on the dog and just basically left the dog there to rot."

The dog was tan with black on its nose and was possibly a mastiff mix, Mr. Kelly said. The cord found on the animal is white with a large yellow three-pronged plug; the plug has #6 written on it in black marker.

Under the Police Act, the SPCA is conducting a criminal investigation into the animal’s death and can lay charges, Mr. Kelly said. He said there are no suspects but a person has contacted the SPCA to say the dog looks familiar.

"They gave us some information to follow up on," Mr. Kelly said.

Mr. Kelly said the dog wasn’t wearing a collar and didn’t have any identifying material on it, such as a bandana.

"When the dog thaws out a little more we’re going to try and test him for a microchip," he said.

It’s not the first time a dog has been hanged in Halifax Regional Municipality. Ten months ago, a dead dog was found in woods in Upper Hammonds Plains. It had been strung up, too.

Regarding the hanging in Brookside, Mr. Kelly said the way the dog was killed was unconscionable.

"The horrible thing about this act is that the dog was cut down but left with the cord around his neck, which shows us that the killers actually watched him die, then cut him down," he said.

Anyone with information is asked to call the SPCA at 835-4798.

Is there a serial dog murderer in the HRM?

Today someone made the grisly discovery of a dead dog, who'd been hanged from a tree with an extension cord - out in Brookside, which is just outside of Halifax. The dog had just been killed in the last day or so, so it's very recent - and the SPCA is hoping someone is going to know that a dog who is beige or orange has gone missing and will contact them.

It rings really eerily for me of a case just last April of another amstaff mix that was found hanged out near Hammonds Plains (which I've pasted below) - a case that hasn't been solved - that was also an obviously owned pet, and it's made me wonder if there is an animal abuser out there who has decided that they are enjoying inflicting pain on dogs that they can get ahold of when they are able to. The dog last year was supposed to have not died immediately - it would've took them awhile to do - so this person enjoys torture.
These stories are horrible from beginning to end. Every part of the world has very bad people - and our little shangri-la is not immune to these human beings it would seem. It would be nice if we could identify this person so that our pets could be safe from him or her, but in the mean time - we should be aware that there is a person out there who might be looking for his or her next victim. Please be aware.

Here is tonight's news piece - and below is a news story from last April:



Dog left to hang was someone's pet
April 08, 2008 - 5:18 am

Police are looking for the person or persons who killed a dog by hanging it from a tree at Pockwork water shed at the end of Hammonds Plains Road.

Judith Gass is the head of investigations at the Nova Scotia Society for the Prevention of Animal Cruelty and she says this was not an accident.

"Plastic twine from its collar hung to a fallen tree. It appears ...the front legs have been taken off the ground and it couldn't get a grip and it hung there."

Gass said the animal's back legs could touch the ground and it choked to death.
She says she's confident someone will recognize the unneutered male dog, which is described as a beige 2-year-old amstaff mix wearing a red collar.

It's estimated the dog was tied to the tree in the last couple of days, because it is not showing any signs of decomposition

Gass adds that the animal is not thought to be a stray, it was someone's pet.
Anyone with information is asked to call the SPCA at 835-4798 or the police.

There is also a file on this case at the Petabuse.com website -


The SPCA is investigating what a spokeswoman described as a "heartbreaking" discovery Monday - a dog hanging dead from a tree in woods outside Halifax.

A man checking fencing around the Pockwock watershed in Upper Hammond Plains made the disturbing discovery.

We think somebody took the dog out there and tied it up to the tree quite high, said Judith Gass, past president of the Nova Scotia SPCA and the agency's head of investigations.

It looked like the hind legs would have been on the ground but the front legs not quite. It would have choked itself to death trying to get free.

"What a lonely, miserable way to die."

Gass said the beige and white, unneutered male dog appeared to be an American Staffordshire terrier mix. She said it was no more than two or three years old.

The SPCA released photos of the dog in hopes that someone might recognize the animal or its red collar.

Several sections of bylaw A300 are deeply flawed

So it's become quite obvious that there are several sections of bylaw A300 are deeply flawed. It's probably not so obvious though that there are people and dog organizations who are trying to work at getting what they believe to be the dangerous to dogs, dog owners - and also the general public's interests acknowledged by the city's politicians and bureaucrats.

I don't think it's a secret that members of the local dog community have banded together a couple weeks ago, in an unprecedented meeting, really - given the dog politics climate in recent months with the contentious goings on after bill 186 went through the Provincial legislature - and is soon going to be coming back into the public space again - but nonetheless - a couple weeks ago - members of the NS SPCA, Canadian Kennel Club, Dog Legislation Council of Canada, Advocates for Responsible Pet Ownership, and Students Animal Law Law Association of Dalhousie University met to go through the current bylaw A300 as it's written to pick out piece by piece what is wrong with the bylaw and submit what we think needs to be changed to make the bylaw safer and better for dog owners, fanciers, and the public at large.

A couple days after that meeting, representatives from that group met with Mayor Peter Kelly - and we submitted changes that we felt needed to be made to make the bylaw a workable document for the city, and for dog owners.

The city's bureaucrats are already working on some sections of the bylaw - so there's some parts that are no use in talking about - because they aren't interested at all in having any conversations about them - but there's other parts that are showing themselves to still being completely abysmal that they don't seem to be thinking about at all.

One thing is the idea about the fact that when a dog is impounded because they've been deemed fierce and dangerous - but the dog's owner has decided they want to fight for the life of their dog - that poor dog can be stuck in a cage for a year because of the way the court system in set up. This obviously is just completely unacceptable.

I met with Peter Kelly - - and we submitted several model bylaws that addressed this - and when we met with him a couple weeks ago - we submitted those bylaws again. Any bylaw that allows a city to impound a dog for any reason and take away the dog from his owner for litigation - MUST set pre-set time limits. To have a dog rot in a cage is WRONG. How anyone on either side would disagree with this is a sadist.

The Association of Pet Dog Trainers has a model dangerous dog law on their website - and they've got a great section that addresses this specifically -

The chief officer of the public pound or animal control department or head of the local law enforcement agency shall notify the owner or keeper of the dog that a hearing will be held by the municipal court or the hearing entity, as the case may be, at which time he or she may present evidence as to why the dog should not be declared potentially dangerous or vicious. The owner or keeper of the dog shall be served with notice of the hearing and a copy of the petition, either personally or by first-class mail with return receipt requested. The hearing shall be held promptly – within no less than five working days nor more than 10 working days after service of notice upon the owner or keeper of the dog. The hearing shall be open to the public. The court may admit into evidence all relevant evidence, including incident reports and the affidavits of witnesses, limit the scope of discovery, and may shorten the time to produce records or witnesses. A jury shall not be available. The court may find, upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious and make other orders authorized by this chapter.

and it goes on ... blah blah blah ... The hearing shall be conducted in the same manner and within the time periods set forth in Section 121 and subdivision (a).

As well - this dangerous dog bylaw sample has a sliding scale of aggression severity/danger - which is great. You can read the whole dangerous dog legislation bylaw at http://www.apdt.com/about/ps/pdf/ModelDogLaw.pdf

Another huge problem with A300 is felt by dog owners who have hobby kennels - prior to A300 they used to be able to register their kennels and pay a $100 yearly kennel fee and have as many dogs as they wanted - but now they have to pay registrations for each of their dogs - and kennels now fall under the 21 different land use bylaws, and not every land use bylaw even has a definition for kennels - so some areas of the HRM don't allow kennels at all - so purebreed people are especially screwed. I've written about this in 2 different spots, first in a post called "Another defect of Bylaw A300" and then recently in a post called "HRM is diabological in its hatred of dog owners"

This was another topic covered by the umbrella group of dog advocates a couple weeks ago. Hopefully they'll take some of our ideas into consideration, because dogs are suffering, and they don't have to be.

Animal Rights Video from Malaysia

I watched the below video about dogs and cats being killed inhumanely at pounds in Malaysia and it really shows that the problems we are having with our animal control department here in the HRM are happening all around the world - there's even a segment where a lady puts a copy of their policies and procedures about "how to exterminate stray cats and dogs" and says that their municipal workers don't have a copy of that policy and that the whole of the department should step down immediately - and it was like - "wow, shit like that really does happen all the way around the world".

If you watch all the way to the end it's a real tear jerker about the humanity in animals, so get out the kleenex. It's a must watch.

Interesting article about pet extravagence

There is a neat article from the Globe and Mail about the fact that we still aren't skimping when it comes to our pets even with the downturn in the economy. I'd agree with that.

Woof? There's no recession nipping at our heels


If Scarlet and Molly have noticed any dip in their personal economies, it's only because fresh salmon is getting harder to find.

The boisterous dogs still get their daily raw beef bones, and their owner treats them to occasional doggy Caesars and lattes. But tinned salmon has superseded the fresh variety.

“I mix it with eggs, because eggs are cheaper,” said owner Susie Horvat, who has cut back on her own food, buying fruit and vegetables only on special and sticking to the bargain racks. “Scarlet likes boiled, and Molly likes scrambled with lots of butter.”

Doggie daycare, is still seen as essential in urban areas.

In dog-mad Toronto, few pet owners are critically eyeing their pooch's lifestyles and wondering if it's time to cut back.

But if owners decide to shorten their spending leashes, a plethora of stores and service providers would be affected, from doggie daycare centres and mobile pet groomers, to ostrich-leather-collar manufacturers and pet couture designers.

“It's still too early to say it's going badly. It has slowed, but not terribly,” said Pauline Lau, owner of Bobo Canada Fine Boutique and “parent” to pampered pooch Bobo.

Ms. Lau opened her second store in Leslieville on Jan. 18, as both a snowstorm and an economic tempest bore down.

While sales of luxury items and non-essentials have dropped, Ms. Lau said it's unlikely pet owners will cut back completely. She remains upbeat about the new store's future.

“People will still buy [treats], but maybe not as much as before,” she said. “Parents don't cut back kids' stuff. For us pet owners, or pet mommies and daddies, [we'll] continue with good quality food and treats.”

Dog daycare remains stable, thanks to the proliferation of dog-friendly condos and the relatively stable Toronto work force.

For the excited dogs bounding around the Umbrella Pet Services play room – just below the downtown west store – that means little change to their routine. Some owners have cut back to half-daycare, but few are pulling out altogether.

“It's a necessity,” Umbrella co-owner Joanne Gourley said. “They need us just like we need them.”

When it comes to appearances, though, some owners aren't quite as breezy with their cash.

Just as hairdressers have noticed people delaying their cuts, pet owners are putting off regular grooming visits.

And luxury pet clothing has lost some of its sheen.

Rufhaus K9 Couture is a three-year-old Toronto company that makes designer dog coats that are sold in Canada, the United States and Europe for $150 to $240.

In response to a slowdown in orders from the United States and a less-intense drop in local sales, the company will soon have its first sale to move extra stock.

“It was a tough call to make,” co-owner Katina Constantinou said. “We've never, ever done a sale. We've never really needed to. … [but] we don't want to lose business, and we don't want to fall off the map, and we want people to enjoy our products.”

The triple-layered, locally made jackets are a luxury, Ms. Constantinou said, but not everyone balks at the price tag. “If they want our product, they want our product. What we offer is hard to find,” she said.

Still, for a short time, subscribers to the company's mailing list could score an unexpected bargain, and Ms. Constantinou is now working on a cheaper line of products for next winter

There won't be any price slashing at ultra high-end pet accessory company Hartman & Rose. The Ancaster-based company sells its Italian-leather, Canadian-made collars and leashes at Nordstroms in the United States, and is now in negotiations with Saks Fifth Avenue. Hartman & Rose also makes exotic leather products by request.

At this end of the market, the only way is up. Customers are looking for new ways to splurge on their pets, and the local, elite appeal of Hartman & Rose is winning fans.

“There's Prada and then there's Payless. We're definitely not a Payless market,” owner Steven Holbrook said.

“Rather than go out for dinner, they're still pampering and spoiling their pets, more so than themselves.”

Mr. Holbrook questions the longevity of other “luxury” items, like wine and beer for dogs, but says leashes and collars are a necessity – even if they are studded with Canadian-made jewels.

“There's a market for everything. It's how you advertise and market,” he said.

Expect no such luxuries for Avery, a Nova Scotia duck-tolling retriever. He may be getting fewer walks with a paid dog walker, but his owner won't scrimp on his favourite treats and quality food.

“I'll go without, not him,” said owner Lisa Brown as she took Avery for an icy morning walk.

Ms. Brown trimmed her entertainment budget after a job change cut her income, but she's making sure Avery won't go without.

“I don't think people cut back on animals. It's like kids,” she said. “His life hasn't been affected.”

Walter the singing boston terrier

Tonight I had the great pleasure of meeting Walter the singing boston terrier and his Mom Mary Ellen.
Walter was adopted a few months ago through Boston Terrier Rescue, and he has found his perfect forever home with his Mom - that's for sure. He is deeply in love with his Mom - and she is deeply in love with him.
It is so great when you see that happen in rescue - when a dog who has special needs finds the perfect home for him. Walter is so lucky - and so is his Mom. And the audience at the local Unitarian church tonight got to watch Walter be his perfect little self tonight.
It's just too bad that didn't include any of his singing - but certainly it got the audience all working together to try to make him feel more comfortable - which was great!
And who couldn't love this beautiful face? Below is some video of the great Walter - for one moment he almost sang - maybe for his next public performance he'll amost sing to for 2 moments - that will be something super to see! I can't wait!

I Think Mr Kelly Has Just Lost the Next Mayoral Election

While Terry Marriott Junior was being murdered in Harrietsfield yesterday, Mayor Kelly was at Kool FM getting his face painted to look like a member of the rock band Kiss - and we now have this fabulous photo of him for all time to look back upon and dredge up whenever we need a picture of him to give us a money shot of his moniker -



Rock on, Mr. Mayor
Halifax Mayor Peter Kelly gets into his role as Gene Simmons from Kiss after he was painted up at the KOOL radio studio on Friday as part of a fundraiser for the Multiple Sclerosis Society. The legendary rock band Kiss will play in Halifax on July 18.

Buttercup being perfect

When I was taping some news tonight I taped a little bit of Buttercup - so I thought I'd put some video of it here with some very pretty music to it - it's just like 40 seconds long or so - Buttercup still has not given up on getting Jack to play with her. It is the cutest thing in the whole world when she shakes her whole body to try and show Jack that she is trying to initiate play. It is gorgeous.

Do you think the same uproar would have occurred if Barton's dogs he killed in NB were "Pit Bulls"?

RG has asked the question -

On a similar vein do you think the same uproar would have occurred if Barton's dogs he killed in NB were "Pit Bulls"?

I titled my post about the Wildside dogs being killed - "Today 145 dogs were killed and a lot of people noticed" - for a reason, and it's because last October I wrote a post called "Chapman Kennels kills 175 dogs and no one cares" - and it was basically about the same thing - a "breeder" killing their "property" - and not one news station carried the story (except for the now defunct Carleton Press).

No one cared that in one shot (well actually in at least 175 gun shots) - in rural New Brunswick Canada - a man by the last name of Chapman - killed 175 of his breeding dogs - and some of them were puppies, just like the Wildside kennels dogs.

Isn't there some kind of a dichotomy there? I agree with you, RG - there's something wrong there. IS it because they weren't pit bull type dogs? Is it because they were used for breeding purposes to be sold to pet stores and not to the dog fighting rings? Is it because it happened in rural Canada and not rural USA?

I don't know. But it definitely does show that injustice for animals is happening everywhere - not just in the United States - it is happening right here in our own back yards, and it's not just happening to pit bull type dogs. It's also happening to the cute little fluffy dogs, too - and they are just as deserving of our advocacy.

Even when no one is watching.

A member of the HSUS has put out a statement about why they've done what they did in the Wilkesboro case - it's abysmal -

John Goodwin, the manager of animal-fighting issues for The Humane Society of the United States -

Thank you for contacting us regarding a county judge’s decision in North Carolina to euthanize fighting dogs seized from the property of notorious dogfighting kingpin Ed Faron. We understand your concern about the judge’s order to euthanize the dogs, and it is always a tragic outcome when healthy animals meet such a fate. But the blame lies with Mr. Faron, and not with county officials or The Humane Society of the United States. While we may not endorse every action of the county, we are grateful to them for working with The HSUS to bust a man who is responsible for an enormous amount of cruelty to dogs, and to bring him to justice.

No organization has done more to attack and harm the dogfighting industry than The HSUS. We’ve probably invested more in combating dogfighting than all other humane groups combined, and to great effect. We are principally responsible for the strong state and federal laws that make the practice a felony and ban possession and sale of fighting animals, and we have trained thousands of law enforcement personnel on investigating and raiding fighting operations. What’s more, it is our training, investigations, and rewards programs that are resulting in the arrest of countless dogfighters and the seizure of thousands of fighting dogs (which are, according to the dogfighters, an asset they lose upon seizure).

We are involved in dogfighting busts on almost a weekly basis, and the handling of Mr. Faron’s dogs raises the same questions that confound us constantly. With approximately 600,000 pit bulls killed in shelters each year, why should fighting dogs, which obviously require more resources to manage and which pose an obvious threat to other animals, get placed in favor of other equally deserving pit bulls and other breeds slated for euthanasia? In a local jurisdiction that has perhaps hundreds of other pit bulls waiting for loving homes, why not save them in favor of fighting dogs that will cost far more to handle on a per dog basis? How do we solve the larger pit bull problem in the nation, since we have an epidemic of dogfighters and others breeding them for aggression and for uses other than as companions?

We conducted a long-term investigation that led to the arrest of Mr. Faron and the seizure of his fighting dogs. He is considered one of the “Godfathers” of dogfighting, and it was our goal to put him out of business, just as it is our goal to target other industry leaders, in order to prevent thousands of dogs for use in fighting pits. Had it not been for our investigation, most of his dogs would have suffered immensely in a fighting pit in the weeks and months ahead. And who knows how many other dogs he would have bred to face this same fate.

It is now an HSUS policy to recommend an evaluation of all fighting dogs. In this case, The HSUS offered to pay for an additional professional evaluator to assess the dogs, even though we were skeptical that these dogs could be safely rehabilitated. The county did not take us up on that offer. Without an affirmative professional evaluation to indicate that the dogs could be safely placed in a new setting, we could not recommend adoption of these dogs who had been bred for generations for their instinct to kill.

While separate evaluations were not done, it is safe to say Faron’s dogs have been bred to produce animals with an unstoppable desire to fight, even in the face of extreme pain and fear. Professional dogfighters typically “cull” the dogs that don’t exhibit gameness or aggression, and only keep and breed the ones that exhibit the desired traits. For proof of that, we can refer to Faron himself, from his book about dogfighting:

“His face had only just healed from that fight with the Wreckers’ dog and he got his nose chewed half off again, that night.”

“The gamest dog I ever saw in my life was King David. At ten minutes, his right leg was broken. At twenty-three minutes, his left leg was broken. At thirty-seven he scratched on stumps, and at forty-eight minutes when he scratched he scratched down one wall and down the other ….until he got to Beau again.””

“ I mean, he broke muzzles, crushed skulls- we saw him bite dogs in the chest and their chest would literally collapse. That was Beau…”

Game-bred dogs pose a risk to other dogs not just because of training, but more importantly because of breeding for aggressive characteristics. Even no-kill shelters typically recommend euthanasia of obviously dangerous dogs.

These fighting dogs do not compare with the dogs from amateur “street fighters,” who typically take any, random pit bull and try and force them to fight. If pit bulls have not been bred for generations to have a “fight crazy” instinct, even if they have been exposed to dogfighting, they have a chance of being rehabilitated. This is why a substantial number of Michael Vick’s dogs were candidates for rehabilitation, after the court ordered Vick to pay $1 million as a set-aside to provide care and retraining for the dogs.

Once game-bred dogs are confiscated from a fighting situation, there are very few good options. There are no sanctuaries that exist for the thousands of game-bred dogs confiscated each year, and as a nation, there are hundreds of thousands of pit bulls awaiting adoptions in shelters every year. The resources that would be required to confine or rehabilitate fighting dogs could save many more dogs in shelters every year. So, in that sense, it is not a zero-sum game when it comes to euthanasia; it is a negative-sum game, and an inordinate focus on these few pit bulls would result in more euthanasia of other dogs. And if you impose upon rural counties – where most fighting busts occur – the burden of long-term holding of fighting pit bulls, then they may decline to intervene in criminal fighting cases, allowing the dogfighters to continue to operate.

There are tough choices to be made, and the only morally clear act is to attack the dogfighters where they live. We are the only national organization that has an entire unit devoted to this work on a national scale. That’s what we’ll continue to do.

The Wilkesboro dogs will not have died in vain

The dog internet is spinning today about the Humane Society of the United States being the cause for the death of the dogs in the Wildside kennels dog fighting case. Best Friends Animal Society have put out a press release urging HSUS to re-evalutate their policies about dog-fighting and killing dogs automatically that come out of those situations based on the success that everyone has seen with the Vick Dogs.

They've formed a coalition with several other high profile groups to speak out against what the HSUS has done and to not let this atrocity (hopefully) happen again. Hopefully these groups together will be more powerful than the largest - what Best Friends is now calling "Humane(?) Society" in the United States. That is pretty sad.

This is their press release -

Humane(?) Society
February 19, 2009 : 6:34 PM ET

The court-ordered destruction of 145 dogs, including about 75 puppies, who were seized from a fighting-dog breeding operation in December, was based on the faulty assumption that all dogs seized in dog-fighting-related busts should be deemed dangerous – and consequently euthanized.

The decision to kill the dogs was supported by the largest animal-welfare organization in the country, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). According to the Winston-Salem Journal, representatives of HSUS testified in Wilkes County Superior Court that the dogs had to be destroyed because they had been “bred for generations to be aggressive.”

HSUS reasserted its outdated policy, written more than 20 years ago: “Any dog who has been specifically bred or conditioned for fighting, or for which there is evidence that the dog has been used for fighting should not be placed for adoption by an animal shelter but humanely euthanized as soon as legally possible.”

A coalition of animal welfare organizations, led by Best Friends Animal Society, offered resources to the county to evaluate, spay/neuter, and find homes for qualified dogs. These animal welfare organizations, which have extensive experience with rescued fighting dogs, urged Wilkes County to accept their offer of support for an alternative to killing, such as the rehabilitation approach used in the Michael Vick case. The coalition includes BAD RAP (Bay Area Doglovers Responsible About Pit Bulls), Animal Farm Foundation, Villa Lobos Rescue Center, Downtown Dog Rescue, The Sula Foundation and Our Pack.

Ledy VanKavage, an attorney with Best Friends Animal Society, said, “We are disheartened and shocked that HSUS, a leader in the animal welfare community, would testify in court for the automatic destruction of puppies and dogs who had not been given the opportunity to be evaluated as individuals, based on [HSUS’s] policy. The Michael Vick dogs have proven how antiquated this approach is.”

In 2006, HSUS advocated that all the dogs from the Michael Vick dog-fighting case be put down, for the same reasons they used when recommending the killing of the Wilkes County pit bulls. In the Vick case, a federal court appointed a “special master” to oversee the evaluation of Vick’s dogs, all of whom were adults. Many of the Vick dogs are now in adoptive homes, and at least two of the so-called “aggressive fighting dogs” are therapy dogs who visit hospitals to cheer up ailing patients.

“The coalition members and their supporters are urging HSUS to re-evaluate this policy and apply a more progressive approach that reflects the lessons learned by the animal welfare groups in the coalition, as well as other organizations that work directly with dogs,” VanKavage said.

Written by Barbara Williamson Photos by Gary Kalpakoff

As part of Best Friends’ 25th anniversary in 2009, our goal is to double our membership, so we can double our efforts to bring about a time when all companion animals have a forever home. What can you do to help? Give the Gift of a Best Friends membership to family and friends.

Coalition Contacts

Best Friends Animal Society http://www.bestfriends.org Barbara Williamson, (435) 689-0200 (cell) or barbara@bestfriends.org John Polis, (435) 644-2001, ext. 4858, or johnp@bestfriends.org

Animal Farm Foundation http://www.animalfarmfoundation.org Stacey Coleman, (845) 868-7559 or scoleman@animalfarmfoundation.org

BAD RAP http://www.badrap.org Donna Reynolds, (510) 441-6461 or donna@badrap.org

Downtown Dog Rescue http://www.downtowndogrescue.org Lori Weise, (213) 448-9961 or lori@modernica.net

Our Pack http://www.ourpack.org/ Marthina McClay, (408) 460-4244 or marthina@ourpack.org

The Sula Foundation http://www.sulafoundation.org Ken Foster, (504) 613-7370 or kenfoster@gmail.com

Villa Lobos Rescue Center http://www.vrcpitbull.com/home.htm Tia Maria Torres, (661) 268-0555 or tiamaria@vrcpitbull.com

Today 145 dogs were killed and lots of people noticed

Last year I wrote a post called "Could Michael Vick be the best thing that's ever happened to pit bulls?" - and it was all about the fact that the Vick dogs were NOT all immediately killed, they were given the chance to live, to be rehabilitated, to show the world that they were like every other dog, and no different than any other dog. It was a great time to be a dog advocate. You could feel the change coming - naysayers were going to see once and for all with these former "fighting dogs" that they could be our companions and that they could live with other dogs and lived to be loved just like any other dog.

And it's true - that IS what's happening with the Vick dogs.

But at the same time - today - 145 dogs from the former Wildside kennels are being killed, simply because it was the Humane Society of the United States - who were listened to, as the "experts" by the people who had the power to decide whether or not the dogs involved in the criminal case - lived or died.

It's absolutely unbelievable. Best Friends Animal Society tried to step in. Bad Rap tried to step in - but HSUS won the day - and all the dogs - and something like 60 puppies - are now dead. Because of the HSUS's expert testimony.

They killed all the dogs without any kind of evaluation - they just deemed they all to be too dangerous to live.

Back when the arrests were made I did a bit of googling and the MySpace page for Ed Faron was still active and he had video of his kennels and video of his dogs - and I watched the videos - and the dogs didn't look that bad - and the kennels didn't look that bad either - nothing like "Bad Newz Kennels" at any rate. What a tragedy.

If there's anything to be learned from this - it's that there are still some very archaic very powerful organizations out there who have too much power, and I hope that the international outrage this story is causing is going to have some effect.

PETA has lost most of it's reputation within the advocate community - I hope this story will take away the HSUS's.

There are some fabulous blog posts about the story - you can go read them at

Bad Rap - Aftermath of a Massacre

Bad Rap - Numb

Nathan Winograd - the death of hope at HSUS


Lassie Get Help - Worse than Vick - and I LOVE it when they say - "because they pay lip service to the dog/human bond, and at the same time help to arrange a massacre. Because they have a script. Because they've spent time rehearsing it. Because Sue Sternberg is their pit bull "expert"." - that is awesome.

Joys of being a dog mum (or dad)

I was sent this today, and I think a lot of us can relate to it -

Before I was a Dog Mom: I made and ate hot meals unmolested.
I had unstained, unfurred clothes.
I had quiet conversations on the phone.
even if the doorbell rang.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I slept as late as I wanted
And never worried about how late I got to bed
or if I could get into my bed.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I cleaned my house every day.
I never tripped over toys, stuffed, chewies
or invited the neighbor's dog over to play.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I didn't worry if my plants, cleansers, plastic bags,
toilet paper, soap or deodorant
were poisonous or dangerous.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I had never been Drooled on
Chewed on
Or pinched by puppy teeth.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I had complete control of
My thoughts
My body and mind.
I slept all night without sharing
the covers or pillow.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I never looked into big, soulful eyes and cried.
I never felt my heart break into a million pieces
when I couldn't stop a hurt.
I never knew something so furry and four-legged
could affect my heart so deeply.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I had never held a sleeping puppy
just because I couldn't put it down.
I had never gotten up in the middle of the night
every 10 minutes to make sure all was well.
I didn't know how warm it feels inside
to feed a hungry puppy.
I didn't know that something so small
could make me feel so important.

Before I was a Dog Mom:
I had never known the warmth
the joy,
the love,
the heartache,
the wonderment
or the satisfaction of being
A Dog Mom.

A couple of langerous poses

I don't know about you, but February is my least favourite time of the year. So only doing things I absolutely have to, and then doing things I really want to - are the things that get done - and because of that I'm taking a couple days away from the computer. I did get a couple particularly good shots of Buttercup though - although I think a 2 year old with a steady hand could take a good photo of her. I wish I had a steady hand. Life would be much easier.

It's been a tough week to be a dog in Atlantic Canada

It's been a tough week to be a dog in Atlantic Canada in the last couple weeks - but things are starting to look up - at least in New Brunswick.

Last week 5 puppies were found in the woods in Baddeck Nova Scotia - 2 of them had already died, but 3 of them were still alive - 1 of them had a broken leg that had already healed, 1 of them had a head wound - but all 3 of them are going to be okay and as of today are already in their forever homes - 100's of people came forward wanting to adopt them.

In Waycobah Cape Breton, a woman's german shepherd was barking at some men who were ice fishing - so they called 911 and the local dog catcher came who shot him 10 times - killing him.

And then here just outside of Halifax in Ketch Harbour - a dog was shot dead when it was on a walk-about - and the owners are devastated - I guess the dog regularly ran around at large, and one of the problems with our provincial laws is that it's perfectly legal to shoot a dog if you say you saw it chasing wildlife and it's owner was not around and under his voice control. So in this sad story the only human breaking the law was the grieving dog owner.


But some good news did happen - because of the recent non-satisfying conviction of Keith Burton up in New Brunswick a new organization has been formed - "The BARK Campaign" - and they have a facebook group - they are an advocacy organization and they've formed because they're -

"Fighting for the animal cruelty laws to be changed to reflect domestic animals as pets, not property". Today’s laws allow the killing of pets to be a non-criminal act as long as you’re killing your own “property” and the animal dies relatively quickly.
Outraged? Join and find out what you can do to help stop this..... You can contact your elected officials by any means and as often as you like until the laws change and make our BARKING stop!!!"

They've watched Keith Burton in New Brunswick be allowed to kill his pomeranians by bludgeoning them to death with a hammer - and now these puppies be left to die in the woods - and it seems they're tired of the way that animals are treated in their province and across the country. Their group has quickly grown to over 1,200 members and they're taking their message to Ottawa to change the animal cruelty laws.

Personally - I want to keep my animals as property - but animal cruelty laws do need to include end of life issues - so that how animals are killed and the methods that are used is covered.

I talked about that "kennel" in Pennsylvania that killed their 70 dogs on this blog when I talked about Chapman kennels in New Brunswick who killed ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIVE of their dogs in one shot - and no news organization picked up on the story a few months ago. It was a national disgrace and no one cared. Hopefully laws will change so that something like that is never is allowed to happen again. We can only hope, can't we?

There is a super article on MSNBC that someone sent me today about the subject that covers the subject -

Animal cruelty laws among fastest-growing - Concept that pets and livestock have rights, as humans do, gaining ground

PORTLAND, Ore. - Some things shouldn't happen even to a dog. But they do.

In Pennsylvania last year, a warden ordered two kennel operators to examine some of their charges for fleas. Instead, Elmer Zimmerman of Kutztown shot 70 dogs; his brother Ammon, who had a kennel next door, shot 10.

Horrible, yes, said Jessie Smith, the state's special deputy secretary for dog law enforcement, when the killings were reported. "But it's legal."

No more. Partly because of outrage over the shootings, dogs in Pennsylvania kennels now can be euthanized only by a veterinarian, and the state keeps a tighter leash on the "puppy mills."

Changes in animal law have come, and not just to Pennsylvania. Other incidents of abuse and a shifting national consciousness have made this one of the fastest-growing fields in the legal profession. In 1993, just seven states had felony animal cruelty laws; today, all but four do.

"Animal law is where environmental law was 20 years ago. It's in its infancy but growing," said Pamela Frasch, who heads the National Center for Animal Law at Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, where she has been an adjunct professor for 10 years.

Lewis & Clark opened the first Animal Legal Defense Fund chapter in 1992. Today it has branches at more than 115 law schools in the United States and Canada.

In 2000, nine law schools had animal law studies. Today about 100 do.

"The reason it is getting taught is student demand," said professor David Favre, who teaches animal law at Michigan State University College of Law and is a top authority in the field. "It's not because tenured professors wanted to teach it, it's that students want to take it."

Favre said most animal law cases in private practice deal with issues such as dangerous dogs, divorce settlements, purchases or other property-related activities.

But it is the animal rights cases that draw attention. And while there have been advances in recent years, some issues remain unsettled. Should pets have more rights than livestock or wild animals? Are some species more deserving of protection?

In George Orwell's words, are some animals more equal than others?

State laws vary widely.

For example: At a Montana campsite, Gunner, a chocolate lab, was killed by a camper who cut off the dog's head with a chain saw and threw it at the owners.

Russell Howald, 30, was sentenced to the maximum — two years.

But in Iowa, undercover video shot by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals shows farm workers hitting sows with metal rods, slamming piglets on a concrete floor and bragging about jamming rods into sows' hindquarters.

"I hate them. These (expletives) deserve to be hurt. Hurt, I say!" the employee yells as he hits a sow with a metal rod. "Hurt! Hurt! Hurt! Hurt! ... Take out your frustrations on 'em."

Scott Heiser of Portland, a former district attorney who now is criminal justice program director for the Animal Legal Defense Find, said Iowa's general animal cruelty law exempts livestock from protection. If charges were brought against the workers, they most likely would be misdemeanors, at most.

Animal law, Frasch said, is a mix of incongruities.

"In the past if someone did something bad to your animal there wasn't much you could do," Frasch said. "But if your animal was stolen and well-treated, it could be a felony. It was out of balance.

"A mouse as a pet has protection. A mouse as a pest can be killed at will. Research mice have no protection. It is the same animal but it is a matter of context."

Portland attorney Geordie Duckler practices animal law exclusively, but as property. Animals, he said, gain instead of lose value over time as owners build affection and investment.

"Someone who runs over a dog may ask why he should pay the owner thousands of dollars instead of just buying a new dog. That might work with a piano," said Duckler.

The concept that animals have rights, as humans do, appeals to many. But not Duckler, who noted in a legal column in "Bark" magazine that an owner can have a dog euthanized or end an animal's pregnancy.

Duckler, who also holds advanced degrees in biology and zoology, said writings and advocacy by animal rights activists tend to be limited to mammals alone.

He asks why earthworms — simple and senseless, but animals, nevertheless — "are left out in the legal cold," while others soak in "soapy tubfulls of nonscientific nonsense that we are not all that far removed from our animal ancestry."

Yet there is a middle ground.

Princeton professor Peter Singer, a pro-animal rights scholar, is quoted in a recent New Yorker article as saying he doesn't think his cats should vote or call on him in the hospital, although he wouldn't object to the visit.

"The right category for pets is closer to children, who can't vote, can't own property but you can't inflict pain on them, either. The law is catching up with societal beliefs."

Well, some of them are, and not just for pets.

In November, California voters banned cramped metal cages for chickens being raised for food and gestation crates for sows and crates for lambs that leave the animals barely able to move. Other states have passed more limited measures, and similar proposals are floating around Congress.

"People are starting to ask questions about things they don't see, and animal abuse mostly happens in places we don't see it," said Jonathan Lovvorn, vice president of litigation for the Humane Society of the United States and adjunct professor of animal law at Georgetown University.

"Most legal protections were drafted in the 1800s. They've upgraded a few of them but the overall framework is not a modern one," Lovvorn said. "Hamilton and John Adams would not be surprised by our cruelty codes today. They would be very familiar to them."

Lawyers from the Animal Legal Defense Fund are busy helping overworked prosecutors try abuse cases, ranging from aggressive cruelty to cases of horses abandoned to starve because owners cannot afford to feed them.

Heiser says he concentrates on helping prosecutors who increasingly cannot ignore animal cruelty cases. "Some may need five hours of research and don't have time for it. We will help them."

Political pressure to require aggressive investigations and prosecutions began building about 15 years ago, he said. Before that, some prosecutors were giving away cases "for a song at the plea level," he recalled.

Pockets of resistance remain, he said. Some prosecutors tell him "it's just a dog" or "I've got real crime to prosecute. I'm too busy."

But new laws in many states, he said, put animal abuse on par with drunken driving cases where prosecutors are prohibited from "dealing," or plea-bargaining, down to a lesser offense.

He said the law students he has met who are devoted to animal law "are very skilled and talented young men and women. Of course the empathy is there but most have faith in the legal system to effect change," unlike some animal rights activists who resort to violence.

Few areas of the law inspire greater emotional response — or more contradictions.

"Companion animals are especially caught up in this," Heiser said. "There are people who would risk their lives to save their dog or cat. But they still eat meat."

Today's GPAC Pet Expo

What a day - I'd say that today's GPAC Pet Expo at the Halifax Forum was a pretty big success - there were a ton of vendors and a few tons of people and their dogs who came to see the vendors. It was a big day and I am exhausted. It was also the first dog event that I've gone to that I didn't take one of my dogs along with me - so that was interesting - not to have a dog with me to interact with the other dogs there - and I totally missed that, and noticed it all day long. There were a lot of dogs at the event, which was great - there are a lot of dog owners interested in providing their dogs with socialization exrpiences, which is fabulous.
This is the table which was next to us - the NS SPCA table, and they had the best centre piece - a little dog who had a successful adoption yesterday - the best little balanced and well behaved dog. He was such a sweet little guy and loved everyone - humans and dogs. I think he had a lot of fun, and showed the public that the SPCA gets small nice dogs as well as the big dogs too.
This is Duke - who you see just below as a puppy - when he was a puppy he was bought from a Pet's Unlimited locally and he almost died because he came with some kibble and a receipt, and he also came with parvo. But his parents loved him enough to spend egregious amounts of money after realizing that a pet store isn't the place to buy a puppy - and even though he had a horrible start to his life, a few years later - things have turned out okay. Duke was one of the reasons that Advocates for Responsible Pet Ownership was originally formed - he was one of our "poster puppies" when we were demonstrating outside of Pet's Unlimited - so it was wonderful to see him today at the Pet Expo and take a photo of him with our banner now that we've reconvened our organization.

This is Riley - a rescued greyhound - his Mom Paula says he does lots of great tricks and this is one of his best - holding a treat on his nose for as long as his Mom tells him too! Yea!
This is Hutch - his Mom Leah is a groomer at Tailwagrrrs - she used to be a regular at Seaview park when me and the dogs went there every day when the dogs were younger - Hutch came from the Lillian Albion Shelter in Amherst and he was about 1/2 the weight he is now. He's well loved now!I was SO lucky! I won the raffle prize from the Tiny Paws Rescue Canada booth!! I got some dog treats, a mug, some stuffed toys and a basket - I'm the luckiest girl in the world - and also because I got to spend some time this weekend with a very nice lady - Charlotte Estabrooks who came all the way from PEI to man the booth yesterday at the Kennel club show and today at the pet expo - talk about dedication!
This may be the first child ever on my blog - this is the very pretty Lauren - the daughter of one of my best friends Debbie - they were at the Pet Expo today because they love dogs - and Lauren had just had her face painted, so she was looking exceptionally beautiful.







I have a slideshow at the end of this post - and I was able to get a couple photos of this little guy smelling this husky's bum - the husky's name is Polaris, but I didn't get the little guy's name - but he was basically digging tunnels he was trying to go so deep!
This is Sage and Guiness - regular reader Janice came down all the way from King's County to see the Pet Expo today and I was SO happy to be able to meet these guys finally - I was sorry that I didn't bring Buttercup when I met Janice - it would've been nice for her to meet Buttercup. I`m sure there`ll be other times though. I wonder how Buttercup would`ve reacted to dogs that look this big. Dogs that are big enough that even when she`s in my arms they are at her face level - that would`ve been interesting!
This is Toby - the most perfect little dog in all the world - I`ve written about Toby several times on this blog - he is just so beautiful. He is everything that a little dog should be. He loves to run at Point Pleasant Park, loves to be held, loves life, and looks beautiful. He`s perfect.

I hope everyone else had as good a time as I did - we gave out a ton of educational materials about what we believe is responsible pet ownership, I saw a lot of people I know, met new people - dog events are always a lot of fun. I can`t wait for the next thing to come up. Dog friendly Halifax is alive and well - at least for the dog owners. The bureaucrats at City Hall might think differently - but the dog owners are wanting to get out and have some fun with their dogs and other dog owners - that was glaringly apparent today.

An oldy but a goody

There's not much going on - just meeting with my friends who are getting ready to go to the Pet Expo on Sunday and waiting to go the Halifax Kennel Club show tomorrow - so I thought I'd post a video to remind us why we love living here in Shangri-la here in Nova Scotia. Enjoy!

Today is Jack's Got Day

It was one year ago tonight that I brought Jack home from his latest foster home that he'd burned through - after arriving back in Metro from animal abuser Alice MacIsaac - he was one of the dogs irrevocably injured by the Celtic Pets scandal last year - and by the skin of his old teeth he was not killed by the Executive team in place at that time at the NS SPCA. Even one of the Special Constables almost killed him because he was being so nasty.


You would too if you'd just livled through many many months at a hoarding animal abusers house with 40 other dogs and you had a huge ulcer explode in your eyeball and receive no treatment for it so you eyeball literally disappeared in it's socket and the hair around your eye became all encrusted with mucus and you couldn't shit because hair become encrusted and there wasn't one part of your body that didn't have a matt on it - so everywhere you felt was rock solid, and his nails grew so long that they had grown all the way around and embedded into the pads of his feet. That's no way for anyone to have to live - but that's the way that animal abuser Alice MacIsaac thought it was okay to let her 40 or so dogs live day by day - so by the time he was rescued - he was pretty unhappy.

I got him 5 days after animal abuser Alice MacIsaac's house had been raided - and the worst and hugest matts had been cut away - so if you can believe it, he was looking pretty good when I got him.


And it's been all sunshine and lollipops ever since then. If only the rest of the world was as good as he is at expressing their emotions - the world would be a much better place. For those who know Jackie - they know exactly what I'm talking about. He's a very special dog - and I'm very lucky to have him.

Further on my "There is so much going on"

I wrote a post a couple weeks ago about all the local dog stuff going on - and there's even more that is continuing to go on. If it wasn't February - the darkest month of the year - I might be enjoying myself right now.


There's more information about Temple Grandin coming to Nova Scotia, which is fabulous. I had an email today from a lady named Marguerite who has gotten to the bottom of the Temple mystery and found out that Ms. Grandin is in fact making several appearances in Nova Scotia when she comes here next week. She's going to be speaking at the Atlantic Poultry Conference, at the Nova Scotia Agriculture College - AND she's going to be speaking here in Halifax on February 19th at Dalhousie University from 7-8pm. Click on the photo at left to find out more information on the person to email and call because you have to pre-register for the Halifax talk.




Susan Jordan is going to be putting on a seminar on February 26th from 6:30 - 8:30 p.m - the topic is "Understanding Dog Signals" and emphasis is on helping dog owners at everyday places like the dog parks, out on public walks and in the home...it will include such skills as learning the difference between rude vs agressive behaviours, recognizing when your dog is threatened or anxious, when they are "shutting down", when they are under pressure, etc. Susan will be using powerpoint, photos and handouts to support the presentation. She will be offering techniques and suggestions as to how to help dogs (and owners) cope with these situations!
Cost is only $20 per person. The location is at "The Chewed Slipper" doggie Daycare in Lower Sackville. You can check out all the details on their website (home page) at http://www.thechewedslipper.com/


And I'm very excited about the fact that my favourite trainer in the whole world - Silvia Jay - is going to be having a one day seminar she's calling "the Art of Mindful Leadership" on April 18th here in Halifax at the Future Inn out in Bayer's Lake. I'm helping her to set it up - so if you're interested in going - you should contact me at dogkisser@gmail.com to reserve your seat - it costs $40 for the day and different topics that are going to be covered are laid out in the poster to the left - click on the picture to find out more. It is going to be an amazing day - and I hope it's just the first of many that Silvia will be giving.





And if you haven't heard - this weekend is a super busy weekend for dogs - all weekend is the Halifax Kennel Club show out at the Exhibition Park, and then on Sunday we've got the Grey Hound Pets of Atlantic Canada Pet Expo at the Halifax Forum's Civic Centre and I found out today they've got like 70 booths signed up - so that's a lot of vendors to browse through. Me and a couple of my friends are going to be at one of those tables - we've resurrected a group we started a couple years ago called "Advocates for Responsible Pet Ownership" - and we're going to be giving out educational materials about responsible pet ownership and puppy mills, and what one person can do to help dogs locally, places to buy your pet supplies locally that don't also sell live animals, information about chaining dogs - and just generally a coming together of local dog owners in a PAC (pack) - or if you want to call it a "political action committee"... it's time to get moving. We also have our requisite facebook group at http://arpolistens.ca/

Rick Howe talks about Blumenthal again

Last night I was reading Halifax Newsnet and I came upon a Rick Howe column and he was talking about Mr. Jerry Blumenthal, our newly re-elected city councilor who seems to be fascinated by dogs. He talked about what I mentioned in a previous post a few days ago - the fact that he tried to ban "vicious dogs" in 2000. I'll paste the article below, it's pretty interesting.

When I was poking around the HRM's website a few days ago, I found minutes from 2001 - when Mr. Blumenthal was deputy mayor and he called for the following -

i) By-Law Changes
Deputy Mayor Blumenthal requested a staff report regarding amendments to the Municipal Government Act, and noted that it is his understanding that By-Law Enforcement staff are currently working with Legal Services regarding some possible changes to the Act. The Deputy Mayor suggested some issues that need to be addressed in these changes which included the following: people not paying their fines, removal from streets of vicious dogs, dog owners not purchasing dog licenses, HRM cleaning unsightly premises and charging the property owners, increased fines for by-law infractions and advertising on trees, poles and in the ground. Deputy Mayor Blumenthal stated these changes need to made as soon as possible. MOVED by Deputy Mayor Blumenthal, seconded by Councillor Sloane, that this matter be referred to staff for a report on possible amendments to the Municipal Government Act to address the concerns raised. MOTION PUT AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

Here is Rick Howe's article - and I have to say again - I love it whenever Lloyd Hines opens his mouth. In this article he says about the valley bull dog who bit the kid up in Stellarton - “Whatever the heck the solution should be, it doesn’t seem right there’s an eight-year-old kid in the IWK torn to pieces.” I don't think that child was "torn to pieces" from the news reports I heard. This is the same man who said -

"I don't want to be the warden of the Municipality of Guysborough and have to go to the funeral of some kid who was eaten."


Now that is a man who loves all breeds of dogs equally. And he's a really balanced guy to get a quote from whenever you're talking about banning breeds, or dog attacks, or anything like that - he is the unmitigated face of evil when it comes to breed banning in Nova Scotia. Luckily we've able to keep it strictly at him so far. He's a one off. He's been the only one able to pass a breed ban - there's a couple other breed restrictions down in his area - but he's the only big winner in our province. We just have to make sure Mr. Blumenthal doesn't get too many tips from him.


Not all Rottweilers are vicious animals

Vicious dogs, not vicious breeds, are the problem

The recent dog attack on two adults and a child in Stellarton has those within the canine-rescue community concerned about renewed efforts to ban certain dog breeds.
Earlier this month, a Valley bulldog was shot dead by a police officer after it had mauled an eight-year-old boy and attacked the two women who came to his rescue. North-end Halifax Coun. Jerry Blumenthal, who tried unsuccessfully in 2000 to have the city ban vicious dogs, says there are too many of these attacks taking place and he plans to revisit the issue in the new year.

He wouldn’t get breed specific, but generalized by saying there should be a ban on “vicious breeds.”

Blumenthal was reluctant to name any particular breed because he doesn’t want a battle on his hands right now with dog activists only too willing to mobilize and fight any effort at a ban.

It may be too late. Local dog activists like Joan Sinden are already warning the councillor not to go down that road. “We will be watching this councillor very carefully,” she said in an e-mail.

Annette Armitage of Animal Rescue in Halifax says people like Blumenthal are too quick to blame breeds like pit bulls and Rottweilers. She points out poodles are more inclined to bite humans, yet no one is calling for a ban on poodles.

“No dog attack is acceptable,” she told me in response to a question about the Stellarton incident. “There are so many triggers that could have provoked the dog. There’s not enough information out before the public to see if this dog was at fault. For example, those Rottweilers in New Brunswick that attacked, the female dog was in heat. There are extenuating circumstances.”

Armitage says breeds are getting the blame when in fact it should be a case-by-case look at individual dogs involved in attacks.

“There are dog bites that happen in our city on a regular basis, but not much actually gets to the media. Breeds get a bad rap verses the actual dog; breeds are not necessarily inclined to violence.”

Ontario, however, banned pit bulls in 2005, the first province to take such a breed-specific step. Winnipeg has also banned pit bulls and Vancouver’s bylaw automatically considers pit bulls a vicious breed. Here in Nova Scotia, Guysborough County has banned pit bulls and Rottweilers. County Warden Lloyd Hines would like to see more onus on dog owners. He says incidents like that in Stellarton require a solution. “Whatever the heck the solution should be, it doesn’t seem right there’s an eight-year-old kid in the IWK torn to pieces.”

A rash of dog attacks in Westville two years ago prompted the town’s police chief to recommend a drastic increase in fines for animal infractions in an effort to force their owners to deal with their pet’s aggressive actions. Don Hussher says he sent a report to the Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities, but it fell on deaf ears.
But that’s the kind of effort Armitage and the armies of others opposed to specific-breed bans say is necessary to make dog owners more responsible. She says it’s the irresponsible owner, not the dog breed, that is to blame for many of the dog problems so much in the news these days.

Other posts relating to this post:

Why I'm glad bill 138 didn't pass in Nova Scotia

We Need to Keep Watch over Councilor Blumenthal

Blumenthal says he was Misquoted

Does Jerry Blumenthal Hate Dogs now like he did 9 Years ago?

Find the dog

A perfect photo appeared to me tonight as I was tucking everybody in - my dogs are pretty typical I think in that coming from less than fortunate backgrounds, they enjoy their indoor and on the bed lifestyles now - and they actually prefer being under the covers - especially Daisy - who lived for the first 3 years of her life outdoors - likes to be under a couple layers - even with all that fur - so you have to look at this photo and figure out where the dogs are in all the bedding. I just sort of fit in somewhere amongst the group and try to get a blanket somehow. It's pretty bad when you let the dogs hog the blanket.

Phoebe finds a home

I got word tonight that one of the dogs I posted the other night - Phoebe - has found a home.
That is super - she's going to be living with one of her littermates - so that's great - she's going to have company, and the owners are going to have a matching pair.
I've got to say - that's going to be a lot of hair, but it looks like their house is quite lightly coloured, so it should be okay - but that is wonderful that a dog has found a forever home - and the dogs look very happy to be together, that's for sure. Kudos to the ladies at the Antigonish SPCA for all the hard work they do and the very little recognition they get.

Some Fitting Video

Here is a video I was sent tonight that is very cute, and very fitting - 2 crybabies - I was sent it in an email, but was fairly certain I could find it online - and of course it was on You Tube - so here it is for you all the enjoy - 2 crybabies - thank you to Betty and Mary - you've seen a lot of crybabies in your time, you know them better than most - don't you!

Moving in a different direction

So I thought I'd put some photos of some dogs who need new homes here tonight since people are coming here looking for good stuff right now - and what's better than photos of dogs who need you!


First up is a dog named Onyx down at the Cape Breton SPCA - they've got several small dogs right now - so if you're looking for that kind of dog right now - you should go and check them out - they have a high kill rate - so getting a dog from there definitely saves a life.
Next is Phoebe - she's a young dog who was chained out for a lot of her young life - but it hasn't damaged her at all - she's a lovely dog, and is just needing some good love
She is about 12 months old, spayed - and ready to go to her forever home - she's under the auspices of the Antigonish SPCA - they can be reached at antspca@eastlink.ca




This is Jade - she is not a rescue - she is a retired show dog from champion breed lines, and is now looking for a gentle retirement home. She has had a very busy show career, and I believe that the breeder who's auspices she fell under - moved away - so she is now staying with another breeder - who is keeping her until the absolute perfect home comes her way - so she is going to have a good inspection process in order to be gotten. She has been well loved her whole life, and is used to the finer things in life - and she has got many years of good living left to go - so if you are familiar with the pekinese breed - and are up to owning a former show dog - you may be up to snuff for this little girl. Jade is 9 years old and in perfect health - and she's not all that fond of children or grandchildren - you can email her current caretaker at indigo@win.eastlink.ca

I talked about Jacques a couple weeks ago, he's a young dog who's been at the Dartmouth SPCA for over 5 months - he's still there, unfortunately - so if you are needing a sports dog - you should have a look at him, he'd be perfect for you.

Oh my dog - I just got these photos late tonight - can you believe how beautiful this dog is? Her name is Maggie and she's in Miramichi, New Brunswick. She's a sheltie, german shepherd mix.
This is what the email I got says about her - "her size and personality are sheltie, markings are shepherd. Her owner was killed in a car accident, and so now she is looking for a new home. Her current owner has moved and cannot keep her. She's a very sweet and gentle dog. She was born in July of 2007."
"Extremely lovable and kind. She's not a barker, and she listens really well once she gets to know you. If you are interested, please email Valerie at whitney.22@hotmail.com, or you can send an email at les@nb.sympatico.ca and they can pass the info along to Valerie.

Cute photo of seal

So I was at Value Village today and I found this photo of the cutest seal ever - and this is an actual photo of a baby seal - not an image cut out of a magazine, or some facimile - after all - I do live in a part of the world that likes to kill 1000's of seals every year, so it makes sense that every once in awhile we might find cute photos of actual seals in our used furnitures stores - I myself have lots of pictures of dead seals on beaches - it'd be awesome if I ever found one alive and cute and cuddly to take a picture of - I've taken some far away photos of ones out in our harbour before - but they're pretty shitty because they're pretty far away.

But isn't this photo cute? She actually looks like she's smiling. She looks like she hasn't lost her baby coat yet. And she looks like she's on an island - lots of seals come ashore to give birth - they don't all give birth out on ice. Some years there's no ice to give birth upon. Just today I got the requisite email from Rebecca Aldworth of HSI about the Hay Island cull that's going to be going on of grey seals in the upcoming weeks - so the sealing season is just about to begin - and all the ensuing melee - if you want to know what I think - I've got a category for it on the right in my categories section. My question to you is - what do YOU have going on in your backyards?

Bowser/Daisy - no resemblance?

Somebody left this comment on my post about the craziness in Ontario -

"not that they should be banned but there is no way in hell that dog only has boxer and rottie in him. Please!"

Here is a photo of Bowser and Daisy - my own personal rottweiller mix - next to each other - they do certainly seem to share some features, don't you think - very cute short ears, large black noses, round large eyes, mouths that are shaped naturally as a smile - really I don't see how anyone could deny - if we are going to agree that yes - Daisy is certainly a rotweiller, because she certainly does hold every characteristic of the breed called rottweiller - then by association - Bowser must also have rottweiller in him because he has several characteristics that make him look like Daisy.

What are the characteristics that make him look like a "pit bull", anyway? Is it his colouring? That is a colour that is associated with boxers - and his owner says that he has boxer in him - so why would that make him have any pit bull in him - that's a boxer attribute. Is it his wide mouth? Boxer. Small ears? Boxer and rottie mixes have small ears.

Only seeing his face - it's tough - but to me - there may also be a smidge of shar-pei in there as well - and you don't know, there could be a bit of some kind of spitz or german shepherd in there too. Breed identification is so tough - and subjective. And really - nobody should ever die for it, should they? Really, it's ridiculous.

Some other dogs who've been killed for biting

The Chronicle Herald Archives have been good for finding articles about other dog owners who've had their dogs seized to be euthanized over the years - I didn't take all the articles I saw for dog owners who'd had their dogs seized, but I did take a couple of them.

From and article from December 2005 - talking about the HRM taking over the city's animal control contract, it very interestingly says - "In October, council's committee of the whole heard politicians bring forward 32 animal-control issues for staff to review and report to council. Allan Waye, the municipality's general manager of community projects, said Wednesday those issues include pet fees and fines, public education, waterfowl in lakes or parks and regulations on the care of rural animals. Mr. Waye said a consultant hired by the municipality estimated there
are 93,600 cats in metro and 67,390 dogs. He said that if a serious dog attack occurs, municipal staff will decide whether the animal must be destroyed.

In hindsight now, what does that sentence mean? Now that we've got A300 signed and sealed and we know that animal control officers are allowed to authorize an animal be destroyed - what does that line mean? Interesting.

The first article I put below is about a person who did seem to fight to save their dog - and then seeing that there seemed to be no way to win - gave up and let the city kill the dog - as well, while the dog was incarcerated - it bit a shelter worker, which seemed to further seal the fate of the dog.

I do really like the last sentence of the article where it says - Ms. Ponnanambalam said the lesson to be learned from the incident is that owners are responsible for the actions of their pets.

The last article is a real kicker - it's about 2 pit bulls from Cow Bay in 2007 - a lot of us will remember this story, and a few of us remember the dogs themselves. One person I know told me about the dogs - that one was a real macho kind of dog and the other one was a follower - a real sweet pittie, a lovely dog - and the dogs were always running at large in their community - the guy I knew quite often saw them running around when he was taking his dog for a run at Rainbow Haven. The amazing thing with this story is that these dogs killed like 40 chickens, were seized - the owner was fined - and then the dogs were returned to the owner!

Maybe A300 was written specifically for this dog owner - so punitively and horribly - just so they could kill any dog they saw fit who "might" reasonably have the propensity to possibly appear threatening - so they never saw a case like this one again. If that's the case - that is very wrong, and legislation should not be written to retroactively try and make things not happen again. That's stinkin' thinkin'

********************************************************

Metro, Saturday, February 5, 2000, p. A3

Dog owner gives up fight to get back pet

A Bedford physician will abandon the fight to get her dog back from the SPCA after it attacked a cat.

Chris Ponnanambalam said Friday that Ravi, her family's Siberian husky, has been held for about three months by the SPCA in its animal shelter at Scarfe Court, Dartmouth.

"At this point, we believe it is in the best interests of the dog to allow the SPCA to proceed with their plans," she said. "This is not the same dog that was taken from us."

Ms. Ponnanambalam said the three-year-old male husky was ordered euthanized by the SPCA after at least one witness saw it attack a cat in November.

"We've since been fighting to get Ravi released to no avail," she said.

But Jackie Vanderheyden, animal control supervisor, said there were "no immediate plans to euthanize the dog.

"Since it is going to court we will not discuss the case further," Ms. Vanderheyden said.

The dog's owners are to appear in Bedford provincial court Friday on charges relating to the animal being at large and an attack on an SPCA staffer at the shelter.

Ms. Ponnanambalam said she understood the dog turned and bit an SPCA staffer's hand.

The SPCA will hold the animal until the matter is resolved in court, Ms. Vanderheyden said.

It's the dog's second stay at the shelter. Ravi was picked up two years ago, after killing a cat, and was later returned to the family.

Ms. Ponnanambalam said the lesson to be learned from the incident is that owners are responsible for the actions of their pets.

***********************************************

Metro, Friday, April 2, 2004,
Biting dog ordered to be destroyed

Animal control officers have ordered a dog destroyed and charged its owner after a German shepherd bit four people in Halifax Wednesday. The owner has been charged under a municipal bylaw with having a dog that attacked people without provocation, Const. Mark Hobeck, acting
Halifax Regional Police spokesman, said.

If found guilty, the woman could face a $250 fine.

Animal control seized the dog and ordered it destroyed, the officer said.

The one-year-old dog escaped from his owner's car Wednesday morning in the parking lot of a medical building at the corner of Dunbrack Avenue and Lacewood Drive and bit four men.

Paramedics treated them. But two were taken to a Halifax hospital for further treatment.

The woman got the dog back into her car until animal control officers arrived and seized it from her.

******************************************

NovaScotia, Thursday, September 6, 2007,
Owner pleads for dog's life

TRURO - One day before a dog is to die for attacking a three-year-old girl in a park on Aug. 29, supporters hope to save it.

"We'll be at the (Colchester) County building for a demonstration at 10 a.m. in the hopes of having my dog returned to me," the dog's owner, Paula Cooper, said Wednesday.

Ms. Cooper said the nine-year-old dog is a family pet and she hopes to persuade county officials to let her pooch live. She calls what happened to the little girl an accident.

"It's not a violent or vicious dog and he's been around kids all his life," she said.

"It was an accident and the little girl is OK."

Mandy Patriquin, the girl's mother, said Wednesday that what happened was no accident.

Gracen Webb lost three teeth, her tongue was bitten through, her jaw was cracked, she took stitches inside and outside her mouth and she had a pile of bruising on her face, neck and chest after the dog mauled her.

"It certainly was beyond biting or snapping because he had her jaw in his mouth and he was chomping down," Ms. Patriquin said.

"It was a vicious attack."

It happened as Ms. Patriquin was about to leave Kiwanis Park. She had already put her children into her vehicle and as she was loading a bike into the back, she paused to talk with Ms. Cooper, who had the dog on a leash.

As the women spoke, Gracen got out of the vehicle unnoticed.

"The little girl came out of nowhere and tried to kiss him on the lips," Ms. Cooper said.

"It happened in three seconds. . . . He just nipped at her.

"The dog got startled and I just had enough time to say, 'No, don't . . .' and it happened."

Gracen was taken to Colchester Regional Hospital in Truro and later moved to the IWK Health Centre in Halifax where she was treated and released. She is to return to the IWK for a checkup on Friday.

The county's animal control officer investigated last week and determined that the dog is a danger to the public.

"It's all just so very sad," Ms. Cooper said.

"He's my family pet and he goes for rides in the car with us and he's never out of my sight . . . like one of my children."

****************************************************

Metro, Tuesday, April 15, 2003
Woman walking dog attacked by pit bull

A woman walking her dog was bitten on the hand, and her dog was injured when a pit bull terrier attacked the dog Monday in north-end Dartmouth.

The attack happened near the intersection of Brule and Burke streets at about 2 p.m., Halifax Regional Police spokesman Sgt. Don Spicer said.

"It was a case of a woman walking her dog on the sidewalk on a leash, and a dog came running out from behind a house and attacked her dog.

She then tried to break it up," Sgt. Spicer said.

The pit bull's teeth pierced the skin on the back of the woman's hand while she was trying to separate the dogs, Sgt. Spicer said.

The woman went to a hospital for treatment, he said.

Paramedics were called to the scene but the call was cancelled before they arrived.

SPCA president Judith Gass said the pit bull's owner turned it over to animal control officers. It was later destroyed.

The woman's dog had to be taken to a veterinarian for treatment. Ms. Gass said she believed the woman's dog "got the worst of it," and needed plenty of stitches.

************************************

NovaScotia, Friday, August 17, 2007
Rampaging dogs had killed before; Escapee pit bulls attacked man's pet rabbits

At least one of two now-dead pit bulls that escaped from their owner's property and slaught-ered 40 chickens at a hobby farm in Cow Bay on Tuesday also got loose in April and killed a neighbour's pet rabbits.

The owner pleaded guilty to several counts of allowing dogs to run at large and attacking without provocation. He was fined $300 and got the dogs back.

"I just couldn't believe it," said Ken Taylor, the rabbits' owner who lives on Dyke Road near the dogs' former home on Spruce Drive. "I'm very disappointed in how this has been handled."

He said an animal control staffer told him Wednesday that the dogs were returned to the owner, identified as Raymond Rolfe, because of a technicality that had something to do with proving they killed the rabbits. A woman who answered the door at Mr. Rolfe's home Wednesday
afternoon said they had no comment.

Mr. Taylor, describing himself as a vegetarian and animal lover, thinks the owner should not have been given the dogs back and that they should have been euthanized then.

He said April 12 was a sunny spring day so he put three of his rabbits - Chloe, Leo and Patches - in a backyard pen and went out to do errands.

He was horrified to hear vicious growling coming from his backyard when he returned home.

Two pit bulls had burrowed under the pen and were chasing a bloodied Patches, while the other two rabbits lay dead.

"I picked up a rock and I kept my distance from the dogs," Mr. Taylor said.

The dogs stopped and looked at him while he looked back, afraid to move any closer.

After about 20 seconds the dogs "ambled off through the hedge," he said.

Mr. Taylor raced to get Patches back inside the house. He said the rabbit is doing fine now.

One of the dogs was soon captured by the RCMP, who returned it to the owner. The other one was returned to the owner the next day. But the dogs got loose again on April 20 and when one came back home that day, police used a warrant to take it away.

The other dog remained loose for some time and worried neighbours started keeping their children and pets indoors.

Animal officers from Halifax Regional Municipality tried unsuccessfully to trap the dog, which was occasionally seen rooting through garbage bags for food.

Andrea MacDonald, manager of animal services for HRM, said she was unaware what happened to the dog, adding the owner had a second pit bull on his property later on.

It's believed the dog simply returned home.

Mr. Taylor said the loose dogs returned to his backyard on April 20, which he told animal control about. A neighbour warned him the dogs were free, so he kept his rabbits inside.

He was later dismayed to hear about the amount of the fine against the dogs' owner. Mr. Taylor didn't know the man got the dogs back until he heard of Tuesday's slaughter on Cow Bay Road, where 40 chickens died.

The RCMP and animal control responded and, at one point, a Mountie shot a charging pit bull. The one-year-old was hit in the hindquarters and was eventually captured and euthanized.

The other dog, a three-year-old, remained loose into the evening before returning home during the night. The owners contacted animal control, which had it put down too.

Halifax RCMP spokesman Cpl. Joe Taplin attributed the decision to euthanize the second dog to its behaviour Tuesday.

"The dog became very vicious."

He said the officer who shot the other dog had to do so because of the threat of serious bodily harm.

"It's a public safety issue."

Officers don't carry tranquillizer darts, he said.

Asked what will happen to the dogs' owner after the chicken slaughter, Cpl. Taplin said: "The investigation is continuing. We'll be working with HRM animal control to decide if any charges will be laid."

Confusion surrounding the identity of the dog that couldn't be captured after the rabbit attack appears to have tied the hands of animal control officials.

"We only know for certain that one of them was involved in the previous incident," Ms. MacDonald said.

"It's gone through the court system. The owner of the dog was charged regarding the rabbit incident and he did plead guilty."

Asked why the dogs were returned to the owner, she said: "There was no disposition decided on the dog that we had in custody so we were required to return the dog to the owner."

Tuesday's incident was the second time the Mounties had to shoot a pit bull in HRM since late July. That's when an officer killed a pit bull that charged him after getting loose and threatening a worker at a surfboard rental shop near Martinique Beach.

Cpl. Taplin said no charges were laid against the dog owner in that case.( )

Does Jerry Blumenthal Hate Dogs Now like he did 9 years ago?

The Chronicle Herald Archives are a fabulous resource - people should go there and have a look around - there are just a ton of articles there that are so relevant to dog politics in HRM today. Today I went and looked up the search term "animal control" and came up with so many good and juicy items you wouldn't believe it - so I'm going to post a few of them tonight - and a couple of them are about our newly re-elected Councilor Mr. Jerry Blumenthal.

He very obviously hateshas a thing about dogs, and has a thing for pit bulls in particular.

Back in 1999 he wanted Animal Control to do more about seizing what he considered "vicious pit bulls" - he felt this breed of dog was terrorizing his neighbourhood and he thought that something needed to be done about it. At the time the NS SPCA had the contract for Animal control and "he accused the SPCA of failing to fulfil its contract with the city by not enforcing dog bylaws - He called for a report to find out why.

I'll put the article at the bottom of this post.

In a second article in July 2000 Mr. Blumenthal goes all the way and calls for an outright ban on pit bulls - he said "that metro should follow the lead of other jurisdictions and outlaw the breed."

He also said at the time - "I think it's about time that we look at the idea of banning certain dogs," Mr. Blumenthal said. "Pit bulls are not bred for harmony or for friendship.""

I wonder if some 9 years later, and now elected to city office a 2nd time if he still feels the same way about these types of dogs that a lot of people feel are no different than any other dogs - so in fact he is making these generalizations about every type of dogs - and therefore by association - saying these very awful things - about our own dogs - and the animals that we let sleep on our beds every night?

I certainly hope he has changed his mind about wanting to ban certain breeds off the face of the earth - although really it would seem like he hasn't seeing as how just in December was saying that in the "new year" he wanted to City Council to look at banning vicious breeds of dogs

Mr. Blumenthal is indeed a City Councilor here in the HRM who is an enigma who needs to be watched by dog lovers who have breeds of dogs that tend to be targetted by legislators who say things like "Germany is now getting involved in (banning) vicious dogs, and . . . I think it's about time that we look at the idea of banning certain dogs," - it`s 9 years later, and he`s still talking about his distaste of certain kinds of dogs - so yes, we should be watching him I think.

Here`s the 1st interesting article from the archives:

Metro, Wednesday, July 5, 2000

Councillor calls for ban on pit bulls

Halifax regional council has been asked to consider banning the ownership of pit bull terriers in metro.

Coun. Jerry Blumenthal (Halifax North End) told council Tuesday that metro should follow the lead of other jurisdictions and outlaw the breed.

No decision has been made.

"We should start looking at the idea of . . . banning maybe a breed, such as" pit bulls, Mr. Blumenthal said.

His stand was prompted by a recent unprovoked attack in Halifax in which a small dog was mauled by a pit bull left unattended in a car.

Pet owner Allan Offman had to repeatedly punch the pit bull in the head to free his terrified Lhasa Apso, which was leashed, from the jaws of the larger, muscular dog.

"Germany is now getting involved in (banning) vicious dogs, and . . . I think it's about time that we look at the idea of banning certain dogs," Mr. Blumenthal said. "Pit bulls are not bred for harmony or for friendship."

Mr. Offman's dog, Mookie, was not seriously hurt when it was attacked during a walk on South Park Street. But he wants the offending pit bull seized and destroyed.

Mr. Offman has asked Halifax Regional Police and animal control officers to investigate.

German officials have announced countrywide bans on breeding and importing attack dogs such as pit bulls after two attack dogs recently mauled a child to death in a schoolyard.

Mr. Blumenthal asked city hall staff to prepare a report on the possibility of outlawing brutish breeds.

Meanwhile, a proposed cat bylaw that's been debated off and on for years has clawed its way back to council's agenda.

Coun. Harry McInroy (Eastern Passage-Cole Harbour South) said staff has been sitting on a report about the proposed new rules.

He said he continues to get calls from residents frustrated with the city's lack of response.

"It's my understanding that there is a (staff) report and a draft bylaw," Mr. McInroy said.

Many householders have long complained about pet cats on the loose, damaging gardens and other private property. Cat lovers say the free-spirited felines are entitled to fresh air and exercise.

Coun. Robert Harvey (Lower Sackville) supported Mr. McInroy's call for a planned bylaw to be brought forward by staff.

"Many residents want to see this faced by council," he said.

Staff was directed to present a proposed cat bylaw to council next week.

The controversial cat-control issue has dogged council since 1996. In January 1997, city hall had a proposal that would have seen cats wearing identification tags with their owners' names and addresses, and owners would have faced a $25 fine if their pet was caught destroying property.

The SPCA estimates there are more than 200,000 pet cats in Halifax Regional Municipality, plus thousands of strays.

Figure:
Jerry Blumenthal: Pit bulls are not bred for friendship.

**********************************************************************

Metro, Wednesday, August 25, 1999, p. A5

Councillor wants SPCA to seize vicious dogs

Jeffrey Simpson; Patricia Brooks
Staff Reporters

A Halifax regional councillor says by not doing its job the SPCA is allowing vicious pit bulls to run wild and terrorize city residents.

Coun. Jerry Blumenthal (Halifax North End) says recent incidents involving the dogs endangered people in his district and he wants to know why the unregistered animals aren't being taken off the streets.

"My residents are afraid," Mr. Blumenthal told council Tuesday night.

"This extremely upset me and the community of the north end."

He accused the SPCA of failing to fulfil its contract with the city by not enforcing dog bylaws. He called for a report to find out why.

When two pit bulls got loose Monday and were acting aggressively in his district, they confronted Halifax police officers who were trying to catch them.

That prompted one officer to fire two shots, but the dogs weren't hit.

Mr. Blumenthal said by missing the dogs, the police unnecessarily endangered people.

"Either the policeman shot at the dogs and missed both times and needs some extra training or the policeman shot in the air and he expected the dogs to stop and lift up their paws and say 'I surrender,' " said Mr. Blumenthal, who also called for a report from police to find out why a weapon was drawn in an area with children and families.

An internal investigation - standard procedure after an officer fires a pistol - is already under way.

An animal control officer seized the dogs, but they were later returned to their owners.

No charges have been laid, but the animals are now listed as "fierce and dangerous" under the municipality's dog control bylaw, meaning they must be muzzled and leashed if off their owner's property.

Mr. Blumenthal said that's not good enough, citing a section of the bylaw he said the SPCA should follow more closely.

Under that section, animal control officers may chase, impound, sell or destroy any dogs that "run at large, . . . that has without provocation attacked or injured any person or animal or damaged property, that are fierce or dangerous to persons or animals, (and) ... that are not registered" in the municipality.

Animal control does not have to let the owner claim the dog.

One of the pit bulls involved in Monday's attack was seized for a second time that night, after her owner was arrested.

Crystal Dawn Morris, 26, was picked up on an outstanding warrant shortly after 11:30 p.m. at her North Street home.

The woman had a tan-coloured female pit bull and two young children in tow as she was taken into a police cruiser.

Judy Pal, police spokeswoman, said Tuesday the warrant - issued after the woman was charged with failing to appear in court - was not related to the earlier incident.

An animal control officer took the pit bull to the SPCA in Burnside. The second dog was not on the premises, Ms. Pal said.

The woman was told to appear in court and then released, but the dog remained in the custody of animal control, Ms. Pal said. Animal control officials couldn't be reached for comment Tuesday.

Ontario really is nuts about pit bulls

I had this comment left on one of my pit bull legislation posts today -

All the "dangerous" dogs will be on the East Coast and in Quebec if this keeps up.

http://www.mississauganews.com/article/23669

Donate $1 so Ontario keeps it`s own "dangerous" dogs.

Damn those google alerts.Can you get addicted?

First, here's the article -

Bowser another Rambo case?

February 3, 2009 02:41 PM - In what is shaping up as a sequel to the Rambo tale, a Mississauga man's puppy might be euthanized or shipped out of province if his owner can't prove he's not a pitbull.

Danny Truong was charged with owning a prohibited animal just before Christmas last year after he took his 10-month-old puppy Bowser to be neutered at a veterinary clinic on Nov. 25.

The 21-year-old said he was shocked three weeks later when City animal services officers came knocking at his home near Square One, charging him under the Dog Owners' Liability Act. Truong said the officers told him that the veterinary clinic had made a complaint.

Truong, who was charged on Dec. 15, made his first appearance in court last Friday. His case was adjourned to Feb. 27, when a date for trial will be set.

Bowser's case is a repeat of Rambo, an alleged pit bull who was shipped out of Ontario to a Nova Scotia home last year after a highly-publicized legal battle.

Rambo's owner, Gabriela Nowakowska, was charged on Christmas Day 2007 when the City's animal control department caught the puppy running loose. Nowakowska pleaded guilty to possessing an illegal dog and was given a suspended sentence on the condition that Rambo would be shipped from the City pound to Nova Scotia.

Truong, visibly upset at the prospect of losing Bowser, said he's being discriminated against based on his dog's appearance.

He said he received Bowser as a gift from his niece and was told by the lady selling the pup that he was a Rottweiler-Boxer mix.

Selma Mulvey, an advocate for dog owners' rights, says dog owners have no way of knowing whether or not they are breaking the law because the legislation is vague.

Mulvey says a pitbull is a slang term and dog owners have no way of knowing how they are violating the law.

"Truong is a responsible owner. He's trained his dog, he's socialized his dog, and he took it to get neutered ... and suddenly he's accused of a serious crime," she said.

Truong says he's never had any problems when taking the dog to the park, pet stores or his regular veterinarian.

"Bowser is very friendly," he said. "Anyone that comes across my dog loves him. He doesn't bite and he's pretty outgoing and jumpy."

So how many wrong things can you find in this article? Number one for me is the fact that this fellow - being a responsible dog owner - takes his puppy in to have him neutered at an appropriate age - and the VET CLINIC TURNS HIM IN TO THE CITY ANIMAL SERVICES. Can you believe that? Who in their right mind after this in Mississauge would take any dog into a veterinary clinic who has a wide browed dog for fear that their veterinarian is going to declare that their dog is a pit bull and turn them into Animal Control? That just blew me away.

This guy says that his dog is a mix of rottweiller and boxer - and I'd tend to believe him. In this photo this dog doesn't really resemble a pit bull to me. I just cannot believe that a veterinrian's office - a place that this man paid money to - would turn him in after he was being a responsible dog owner. I absolutely cannot believe that.

I cannot believe what Ontario has become. If this is happening on a regular basis up there - then Ontario is a province where dog owners have no respect, rights, reason to believe that they can keep their dogs safe, or that that they live in a province that is anything less than a huge gas chamber for their canine life companions.

This news article is absolutely unbelievable. I am speechless if you haven't been able to tell by now. As an aside - Nova Scotia would love to have Bowser - we love all breeds of dogs here. Except for in the district of Municipality of Guysborough though - otherwise known as the Fiefdom of Lloyd Hines.

In other news - the Dog Legislation Council of Canada met it's fundraising goal by January 31st - so they are going to be putting in their Supreme Court Challenge for the pit bull ban in Ontario with Clayton Ruby - so the fight in Ontario is not quite over yet, hopefully.

A Dark day for Dog respect in New Brunswick

The judgment came down today on the Minto New Brunswick man who killed his pomeranian dogs by smashing a hammer on the back of their heads - killing them rather than giving them up to the NB SPCA who were trying to seize them because he was going to be charged with negligence.

He was found not guilty of animal cruelty to all the dogs he actually killed because the judge decided that since he smashed them on the back of their head and rendered them unconcious - they didn't actually suffer. The only cruelty charge he was found guilty of was for the dog who lived - Ronald - the 9 year old pomeranian who's in the photo in this post. He was also found guilty of not giving adequate water to 3 other dogs. He's not allowed to have or breed any animal for a year - I personally hope he never has another animal again - because he obviously was not able to take care of the animals he had - which was the genesis of all this trouble - and why the NB SPCA was at his property in the first place. Such a tragic story.

He was fined a total of $550.

Was this an adequate conviction for such a crime against so many animals? Compared to other convictions that we've seen recently, it's pretty much on par - but it definitely shows the inequality between the court system and popular culture - and really one needs to catch up with the other. Hopefully, really - our generation and the next is going to do something about it, because it needs work.

I'm not talking about moving companion animals out of the property category - but simply attaching more penalty to cruelty - everyone by now agrees that anyone who harms an animal will move pretty easily over to humans - so why is it so difficult to change the laws to toughen up cruelty legislation? What conglomerates would suffer? Who would lose money if cruelty legislation was better written? To me it's a win-win situation.

Here's an article that came out tonight -

N.B. man acquitted of animal cruelty in dog deaths
Last Updated: Tuesday, February 3, 2009 | 3:55 PM AT

CBC News
A Minto man has been acquitted of animal cruelty charges in connection with the deaths of five Pomeranian puppies.

Keith Barton killed the dogs with a hammer in April 2008 when SPCA officers went to his kennel to seize his 13 dogs.

Judge Patricia Cumming found Barton not guilty of cruelty in killing his five dogs but she did, however, find him guilty of injuring a dog.

At the provincial court in Burton on Tuesday afternoon, the judge said during the trial that the evidence showed the dogs were rendered unconscious when they were hit with Barton's carpenter's hammer and therefore they did not suffer.

In the case of one dog, named Jake, who survived, Cumming found it likely that it did suffer pain. The judge found Barton guilty of injuring the dog in contravention of the Criminal Code of Canada.

When Barton testified in November he described the day he killed his dogs as "the worst day of my life, when I had to do that to my babies."

Barton also faced three charges under the provincial SPCA Act of failing to give proper care to his 13 Pomeranians. Cumming ruled Barton failed to give water to these animals and she fined him the minimum of about $120 on each case.

When the sentence was handed down in the provincial court, Barton silently bowed his head.

He did say that he was willing to pay the total fine of about $550 immediately.

The judge gave him a conditional discharge, with the condition that he cannot own a dog or pet for the next 12 months.