Sunday, May 11, 2008

‘A betrayal to rescue’

from today's Chronicle Herald:


A staff member at the Westwood Hills Veterinary Hospital in Upper Tantallon works on Scupper, one of the dogs seized from Celtic Pets, in February. The work, done free of charge, including removing one kilogram of matted fur. Scupper was among at least six dogs euthanized this week.
Animal lovers are searching for answers after the SPCA confirmed it has euthanized six of the 51 dogs seized in an animal-neglect case.

"It’s a betrayal to rescue," said Annette Armitage of Animal Rescue Coalition, a group that provides foster homes for rescued pets.

Pamela Keddy, president of the Nova Scotia SPCA, could not be reached Saturday, but she told CTV News on Friday that the six dogs, which were seized from Celtic Pets in February, were not adoptable.

"They had been presenting the whole time as being very aggressive toward staff," Ms. Keddy said. "We’ve had incidents with at least four of the dogs biting and attacking staff, and the other two had been presenting . . . the entire time as well, lunging and presenting as very difficult dogs to deal with."

Janet Chernin, a former member of the group’s board, wasn’t buying that explanation.

"These dogs did not have to die," she said.


Scupper is anethesized so Westwood workers can remove his matted fur. A rescue group says they found a person interested in adopting the dog, but the SPCA turned her down.

Ms. Chernin said Ms. Keddy called her to help assess the seized dogs as they came to the Metro SPCA from Port Hastings. The owner and operator of a dog daycare said the dogs were "very stressed-out animals that were again placed in concrete cages." Some of them, she said, were aggressive and bit people.

She, like most of those working at the Burnside shelter, is not certified to properly assess the animals.

But from her experience, she said it would have taken "a lot of time and patience" and experienced handling by foster families to turn these animals into adoptable dogs, "but that’s what these animals deserved."

And there were families prepared to take at least two of the dogs as long ago as February. Ms. Armitage said her group found one interested person who was turned down. She said it was because the woman wouldn’t bring her two dogs into the shelter to see if they and the rescued dog, Dottie, were compatible.

A shelter volunteer and dog trainer had offered to take Dottie to the woman’s farm to assess the situation, Ms. Armitage said, but the SPCA turned down the request.

The dog bit a shelter worker on the night he was brought in, she said.

Ms. Armitage, a member of the Nova Scotia SPCA who was called in with Ms. Chernin in February, said once the dog’s matted fur was shaved off, he reacted differently.

"He couldn’t be crated or kennelled, but he was salvageable," she said.

A second dog, Scrumper, was slated to go to another foster home found by the rescue coalition. Ms. Armitage said she had been corresponding with Ms. Keddy to confirm the arrangements had been approved.

"I still haven’t had the guts to call the original owner," Ms. Armitage said. "I haven’t got the guts because she knew we were working to get him (to the foster home)."

Two women — Zonda MacIsaac and her mother, Alice — face animal cruelty charges stemming from seizure of more than 100 animals, some sick and some dead, from Zonda’s shelter during two raids in February.

Both women are to appear in court in Port Hawkesbury on May 21.

In past criminal animal cases, Ms. Chernin and Ms. Armitage said, the SPCA has been required to keep even vicious dogs alive until all court proceedings have been completed. Neither knows why the SPCA wasn’t required to do so in this case.

Both animal-lovers said they have plenty of questions for the SPCA. They want to know what assessments were carried out on the dogs and whether they were conducted by properly certified people. As for one of the dogs, which was believed to have health problems, they want to know why he was allowed to languish in a cage for three months before he was destroyed. And they want to know why the dogs weren’t allowed to go to qualified foster homes.

Ms. Armitage, a longtime SPCA supporter, said she’s tried to keep out of the political side of the organization, which has been the subject of much controversy, including an annual general meeting that was closed to the public and was rife with in-fighting.

But she’s speaking out now, in hopes that those in need are not forgotten. "We’ve got to get back to the animals here," she said.

*****



This photos shows a snapshot from the NS SPCA's website on March 10th, 2008 - it's a section of the NS SPCA's website called their "Happy Tails" - it's called "Scupper's Transformation" - and it shows Scupper getting all his matted fur cut off. I'm assuming it was put on their "Happy Tails" section to show the transformations that the Celtic Pets dogs were going through - the rebirth that they were all able to go through now that they were in the caring, loving hands of the NS SPCA.

And now 2 months late - almost to the day - this same dog is dead. Also at the hands of the NS SPCA. I don't know if I would call that a "Happy Tail". For some reason, that link has disappeared fromt he main page of the NS SPCA website. Funny, eh? I wonder how many people gave money when they saw this heartbroken little dog being given a new chance at life.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:29 PM

    SPCA IS GOING TO BE SUED FOR THIS MOVE. THEY BROKE THE LAW. WHEN THIS GOES FORWARD, THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR THE SPCA TO BE DISBANNED AND THEN THERE IS NOTHING..."OH BUT THE ANIMALS WILL SUFFER THEN" (YOU SAY) YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SUFFERING ANYWAY! THE GLOVES ARE OFF MS. KEDDY AND LET'S SEE HOW QUICK YOU AND JUDITH WILL BE TO SIGN THE CHEQUE TO PAY FOR THIS DECISION. AND LET'S SEE IF THE BOD AND DR. MORRISON WILL SPEAK UP NOW TO KICK YOUR SORRY ASS TO THE CURB!!!!!!! THOSE DOGS ARE NOT GOING TO DIE IN VAIN.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous9:43 PM

    Also being involved with the SPCA, I have met the animals that were euthanized and have to agree with the decisions that the staff did end up making. They did work with the animals but they really weren't improving any that I think they would have felt safe putting them into a foster home feeling that the foster parents would have been safe.

    I think that in situations like these, people should be putting themselves into the shoes of the staff. I don't think that many people who have been upset over the euthanization of these animals have personally worked with these animals and knew what they were like.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:10 AM

    I personally worked with one of those animals, i personally had foster with a trainer set up for one of those animals. There were people welling to sign a release and offer up their homes to those animals. Interesting that the 90 day waiting period was up, and they chose to kill those animals, that could have been saved. Thank you Joan for loving Jackie as we know he would have made number 9 they would have killed

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:41 PM

    I OWN THOSE ANIMALS LEGALLY AND THEY WERE NOT TO BE DESTROYED UNTIL THIS CASE GOES BEFORE A COURT OF LAW. I HANDLED THOSE ANIMALS AND I AM NOT A QUALIFIED TRAINER AND THEY WERE MOST CERTAINLY MANAGEABLE SO FOR ANYONE TO SAY THAT THEY WEREN'T IS FULL OF SHIT. YOU CAN'T TAKE THOSE ANIMALS PUT THEM WITH A BUNCH OF STRANGERS, LEAVE THEM IN CAGES FOR THREE MONTHS USE SCUPPER TO LINE THE SPCA POCKETS, LIE TO THE PUBLIC AND THEN KILL THEM. THIS WILL NOT BE TOLERATED. THOSE DOGS WERE MANAGEABLE, THERE WERE FOSTER HOMES WAITING, THAT KNEW WHAT BEHAVIOURS THEY WERE DEALING WITH AND ALSO THEY DID NOT, AND I REPEAT, DID NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO DESTROY THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE UNTIL IT GOES TO COURT, IS THROWN OUT, OR PARTIES FOUND GUILTY OR INNOCENT. WHATEVER PEOPLE THINK OF ME AT THIS POINT IS IRRELAVANT. THE POINT NOW IS THOSE DOGS SHOULD BE ALIVE AND SOMEONE IS GOING TO BE ACCOUNTABLE. (PS and don't bother coming back at me on the blog with what you say I did, didn't do, etc. I won't respond to any of that and you can think whatever you want. THE ISSUE IS BRE, SCUPPER, BUDDY, REX, DAMIEN AND DOTTIE (GRACIE) WHO PAID WITH THEIR LIVES.

    ZM

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11:20 PM

    the staff at the spca need to be trained to deal with dogs that are in stressful situations if not they shouldn't be there. Shouldn't the spca be working with rescues and foster homes ? Aren't they are suppose to be educating and training people, isn't that part of the CCRA mandate for charitable status ? Didn't they spend $50.00 on that the other year? If the NS SPCA can't handle and deal with abused animals from cruelty cases then they shouldn't be in charge of them. They shouldn't have anything to do with any kind of animal except the perfect pet being rehomed scenario. Well that's enough what if's . How do they explain killing their poster dog from their website . Where are the people involved in this "euthanasia spree"? If the dogs were that bad why were they kept so long with people that couldn't handle them? Why was the staff put at risk for 90 days ? Or was it the 90 day stay that changed them ?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:07 PM

    Zonda has alot of nerve speaking out about what kind of care the NS SPCA has given to the dogs that were seized from her DISGUSTING, DISEASED ridden "shelter" Shame on you Zonda! Perhaps you should look in the mirror and take note of what YOU put these animals through. As for not caring what other people think...I'm not surprised. The only thing you care about is you. And you demonstrated that by HORRIBLY abusing all of those animals who looked to you for care.

    ReplyDelete